Performance Assessments from the Perspective of Generalizability Theory

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all? (2009, unknown): “Brennan (2000) considers Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) as the parents of G-theory.”
The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation (2012, methodology): “…ratio of universe score variance to itself plus relative error variance) and is analogous to a reliability coefficient in classical test theory (Brennan, 2000); and (phi), also called the dependability coefficient (the ratio of universe score variance to itself plus absolute error variance),…”
How fine is C-OAR-SE? A generalizability theory perspective on Rossiter's procedure (2005, methodology): “However, shifts in educational performance assessment priorities (Brennan, 2000) towards non-dichotomous response scales and a recent comprehensive treatment of the theory (Brennan, 2001a) with relevant software (Brennan, 2001b) suggest this can change.”