A Quasi Experiment to Assess the Consumer and Informational Determinants of Nutrition Information Processing Activities: The Case of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act

By Christine Moorman. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards (2018, background): “By mandating the label, vital nutritional facts were communicated in the context of the “Daily Value” benchmark, and consumers could quickly assess nutrition information and more effectively abide by dietary recommendations at the moment of decision [10–12] .”
Promoting Healthy Choices: Information versus Convenience (2010, unknown): “However, these beneficial effects vary according to individual characteristics, such as age and cognitive ability ( Cole and Gary J. Gaeth 1990 , motivation ( Christine Moorman 1996 , and self-control ( Finkelstein, Ruhm, and Kosa 2005 .”
Consumers' Search and Use of Nutrition Information: The Challenge and Promise of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (2002, methodology): “Motivation, defined as consumers’ goal-directed arousal to process nutrition information, increases the effort devoted to search and encode such information (Moorman 1996).”
Socio-demographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping (2016, background): “Moreover, most choices in retail environments are made under time pressure, with a median estimated choice time of 1 s (Moorman, 1996, p. 36), suggesting that automatic cognition should prevail in supermarket grocery shopping (Beattie & Sale, 2011).”
Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels: A Review of Research Studies and Issues (2006, methodology): “…paragraphs (e.g. Drichoutis, Lazaridis, and Nayga, 2005; Guthrie et al., 1995; Kim, Nayga, and Capps, 2001a; Nayga, 2000; Wang, Fletcher, and Carley, 1995), label use was measured with questions similar to what Moorman (1990; 1996) and Keller et al. (1997) have used as a motivation variable.”
Promoting positive change: Advancing the food well-being paradigm☆ (2013, background): “Product information including labels (Howlett, Burton, & Kozup, 2008; Moorman, 1996) and nutrition disclosures (Andrews et al.”
The Influence of Incidental Affect on Consumers’ Food Intake (2007, background): “When information is easy to understand, consumers tend to use it (e.g., Moorman 1990, 1996).”
When do you Want It? Time, Decisions, and Public Policy (2006, methodology): “A cooling-off period is simply some period of time in which a consumer has the option to “rescind, disaffirm, or revoke a contract, or more generally as a withdrawal right” (Rekaiti and Van den Bergh 2000, p. 371).”
The Effect of Marketer-Suggested Serving Size on Consumer Responses: The Unintended Consequences of Consumer Attention to Calorie Information (2012, background): “First, people who are more concerned about negative eating behaviors are likely to weight nutritional information more when judging the appeal of a product (Moorman and Matulich 1993).”
Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing' (2014, background): “The label format is crucial, especially if it can reduce the perceived costs of searching and processing this information (Moorman 1996).”
Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices (2004, background): “Research in the label and warning area has shown that the content and format of labels and warnings are directly related to the ability of consumers to process and subsequently use the information in the notice (Moorman, 1990, 1996; Stewart & Martin, 1994).”