Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels: A Review of Research Studies and Issues

By A. Drichoutis, P. Lazaridis, R. Nayga. 2006

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards (2018, background): “Though some cast doubt on the benefits of the mandate in light of its costs [15] , most research concludes that the “Nutrition Facts” label has positive impact [16,17] .”
Factors influencing organic food purchase in India – expert survey insights (2010, background): “Certification process-related information is an important parameter in the research in organic food category (Misra et al., 1991; Michelsen et al., 1999; Gaskell, 2000; Reisch, 2001; Krystallis and Chryssohoidis, 2005; Drichoutis et al., 2006).”
Nudges for Privacy and Security (2017, background): “Studies about the impact of nutrition labels, however, have concluded that the ones who beneﬁt the most from these labels are people who are already motivated to investigate nutritional content [Drichoutis et al. 2006].”
A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels (2007, background): “These conclusions are also supported by a review by Drichoutis et al. (2006). The European Heart Network review also concluded that actual label reading as revealed by protocol analysis was a good deal lower than reported label reading, which is in line with results in the Waitrose (58) study review”
Traffic Lights and Food Choice: A Choice Experiment Examining the Relationship Between Nutritional Food Labels and Price (2010, background): “In a comprehensive review of the literature Drichoutis et al. (2006) observe that most research indicates that consumers do respond to nutritional labels but mostly in a negative manner.”