Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context
By Joyce Osland, A. Bird. 2000
607 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09743b4c292fe9b98fadf2a20965ac14fe00e4e2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
Citations in the corpus
- Social support across cultures (2006, background): “Sagiv and Schwartz (2000) found the values were related to work role stressors and managers’ decisions when confronted with a dilemma.”
- The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: a multicountry study (2004, background): “Osland and Bird (2000) warned that cultural stereotyping may cause researchers and managers to overlook important complexities within a culture.”
- Career commitment in collectivist and individualist cultures: a comparative study (2002, background): “Osland and Bird (2000) argue that such conceptual descriptions amount to ‘sophisticated stereotyping’ which, although based on theoretical concepts rather than primitive prejudice, still constrains individuals’ perceptions of behaviour in another culture.”
- Global Leadership: A Developmental Shift for Everyone (2012, background): “The framework of bipolar cultural dimensions that has characterized much intercultural research is sometimes referred to as ‘‘sophisticated stereotyping’’ (Osland & Bird, 2000).”
- The expanded view of individualism and collectivism: One, two, or four dimensions? (2020, background): “Osland and Bird (2000) listed 22 of these cultural dimensions.”
- When Do Global Leaders Learn Best to Develop Cultural Intelligence? An Investigation of the Moderating Role of Experiential Learning Style (2013, background): “It often involves highly confusing cultural issues (Osland & Bird, 2000) and an emotional cultural shock experience (Adler, 2002).”
- Values, schemas, and norms in the culture–behavior nexus: A situated dynamics framework (2015, background): “While awareness of these broad tendencies is useful, Osland and Bird (2000) argued that these depictions are but “sophisticated stereotypes” that fail to capture situational nuances.”
- From Experience to Experiential Learning: Cultural Intelligence as a Learning Capability for Global Leader Development (2009, background): “Cultural paradoxes—situations or interactions that involve contradictory norms or behaviors—are common encounters for expatriates in all cultures (Osland & Bird, 2000).”
- A Study of the Relationship Between Organizational Commitment and Human Values in Four Countries (2004, background): “First, international managers need to be flexible when generalizing people’s values on the basis of culture values studies, as context might in fact create differences (Osland et al., 2000).”