The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: a multicountry study

By Jennifer W. Spencer, C. Gomez. 2004

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f53a8c97e3dccf32c867c88e3564b093c88c270

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome (2014, background): “…of the very high practical importance of the issue, it seems that there is no consensus on whether the policies designed to contribute to entrepreneurship are effective and what governments can do to promote an environment conductive for new firm growth and development (Spencer and Gómez 2004).”
National Rates of Opportunity Entrepreneurship Activity: Insights from Institutional Anomie Theory (2014, background): “Economists and some management scholars focus on the institutional drivers of entrepreneurship (e.g., Baker, Gedajlovic, & Lubatkin, 2005; Busenitz, Gómez, & Spencer, 2000; Davidsson & Henrekson, 2002; Spencer & Gómez, 2004).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “…Braunerhjelm et al. (2015), Busenitz et al. (2000), Calcagno and Sobel (2014), De Clercq et al. (2010), Meek et al. (2010), Manolova et al. (2008), Spencer and Gomez (2004), Stenholm et al. (2013), Valdez and Richardson (2013). related with access to stock markets (Bruton et al. 2009), the…”
Overcoming the liability of newness: Entrepreneurial action and the emergence of China's private solar photovoltaic firms (2016, background): “A complementary but largely separate stream of sociology-based literature draws attention to the role of the institutional context in entrepreneurship (e.g., Aidis et al, 2008; Bowen and DeClerq, 2008; Busenitz et al, 2000; Manolova et al, 2008; Sobel, 2008; Spencer and Gomez, 2004).”
Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis (2014, background): “Spatial research on larger geographical scales has become widely established (Trettin and Welter, 2011), providing useful insights into the role that national institutions play in entrepreneurship (Busenitz et al., 2000; Spencer and Gómez, 2004; Stenholm et al., 2013).”
A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model (2008, background): “…to measure the effect of national culture on entrepreneurial activity using standard national culture measures and appropriate controls have been mixed (Spencer and Gomez, 2004; Levie and Hunt, 2005), reflecting recent findings on relationships between national cultural values and practices…”
Quantifying the relationship between entrepreneurship and competitiveness development stages in Latin America (2011, background): “The influence of entrepreneurial dynamics1 on countries’ competitive development (and consequently on their economic growth) presents a complex relationship (Spencer and Gómez 2006).”
E-Commerce Technology Adoption: A Malaysian Grocery SME Retail Sector Study (2015, background): “NIP suggests the prevalence of entrepreneurial activities associated with specific dimensions of a country's institutional environments (Spencer & Gomez, 2004).”