Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities

By Constance E. Helfat, Margaret A. Peteraf. 2015

1,757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08e3fa08e586f88dbd5a158f0a59d046cefd88c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Oliver Schilke
2. Pilar Marqués
3. Stav Fainshmidt
4. Songcui Hu
5. N. Boso
6. R. Hoskisson
7. J. Zyung
8. A. Bikfalvi

In Strategy and Management

1. Oliver Schilke
2. Nathan R. Furr
3. Constance E. Helfat
4. Michael L. Tushman
5. Stav Fainshmidt
6. Songcui Hu
7. Vibha Gaba
8. Mary Ann Glynn

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy (2016, neutral): “dynamic capabilities.(13) Effective entrepreneurial management is especially critical when there is a greater need to achieve organizational agility.”
• Flexing the Frame: TMT Framing and the Adoption of Non-Incremental Innovations in Incumbent Firms (2017, positive): “Our theorization and application of cognitive flexibility attends to calls within the strategy literature to more fully account for how cognitive frames influence the competitive dynamics of strategic decision making within the firm (Helfat & Peteraf, 2015; Livengood & Reger, 2010).”
• Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Research (2018, methodology): “Future research would in our view also benefit from greater elaboration of agency in the dynamic capabilities framework, following up on recent investigations into this matter (Augier & Teece, 2009; Es-Sajjade & Pandza, 2012; Helfat & Martin, 2015; Helfat & Peteraf, 2015; Salvato, 2009).”
• The strategic management of high-growth firms:a review and theoretical conceptualization (2017, neutral): “Research may also seek to move beyond standard measures of human capital to study cognition and cognitive abilities as a microfoundation to other elements of human capital and the circumstances under which it favors or stymies high growth (Helfat and Peteraf, 2015).”
• The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance (2013, background): “Moreover, since TR and IR are static in nature (Teece, 2007; Helfat and Peteraf, 2015),”
• Strategy and Uncertainty: Resource-Based View, Strategy-Creation View, and the Hybrid Between Them (2021, background): “The second strand of dynamic capabilities (e.g., Helfat & Peteraf, 2015; Teece et al., 1997) is also ripe for empirical study.”
• Entrepreneurial alertness and new venture performance: Facilitating roles of networking capability (2018, background): “On this note, we conceptualise entrepreneurial alertness as a cognitive resource that affords the entrepreneur a cognitive capacity to identify opportunities ahead of others (Helfat and Peteraf, 2015; Messersmith and Wales, 2013).”