Flexing the Frame: TMT Framing and the Adoption of Non-Incremental Innovations in Incumbent Firms

By R. Raffaelli, Mary Ann Glynn, Michael L. Tushman. 2017

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Why do incumbent firms so frequently reject non-incremental innovations? One reason is due to the firm’s top management team’s (TMT) lack of frame flexibility, i.e., an inability to expand the organization’s categorical boundaries so as to encompass a wider range of emotionally resonate capabilities in the context of innovative change. For incumbent firms, we argue that the way the TMT cognitively thinks about, and emotionally frames, non-incremental innovation and organizational capabilities drives innovation adoption. We show that frame flexibility is both cognitive, through claimed beliefs and understandings, and emotional, through claimed appeals to feelings and aspirations. First, we reexamine an assumption that cognitive frames are static and suggest how they evolve to become flexible – via shifts in perceived categorical hierarchies and in the ability to reconcile incompatible organizational capabilities. Second, we theorize and attend to the role of emotional frames in innovation adoption. Thus, we advance a model that articulates how cognitive and emotional framing affects the likelihood of non-incremental innovation adoption and, over time, the breadth of the organization’s innovation practices. We delineate these processes, as well as the internal and external contingencies that influence them, and offer directions for future research.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a833cfa13f08c902ea1fa6741e9f8816fd0a2270

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field (2021, background): “This could be considered an effective representation of the impact generated by the development of new forms of technology characterized by a high degree of digitalization (Raffaelli, Glynn, & Tushman, 2019).”
Parallel Play: Startups, Nascent Markets, and Effective Business-model Design (2019, background): “Such factual grounding speeds decision making, improves executives’ confidence about their choices, and reduces emotional conflict (Eisenhardt, 1989b; Raffaelli, Glynn, and Tushman, 2019).”