Assessing the discriminant validity of the Leadership Practices Inventory

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Transactional and transformational leadership (2014, methodology): “Studies using the LPI have demonstrated its validity and reliability in measuring these leadership practices with a number of different populations, including students, business and police managers (Posner, 2004; Carless, 2001; Zagorsek et al., 2006; Vito and Higgins, 2010).”
Senior expatriate leadership's effects on innovation and the role of cultural intelligence (2009, result): “Similar findingswere reported in studies using data from a diverse array of countries: USA (Fields & Herold, 1997; McNeese-Smith, 1999; Zagorsek, Jaklic, & Stough, 2004), Australia (Carless, 2001), Nigeria (Zagorsek et al.”
Loving yourself abundantly: relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. (2006, background): “Moreover, research suggests that the LPI assesses an overarching construct of transformational leadership (Carless, 2001).”
Servant Leadership Behaviour Scale: A hierarchical model and test of construct validity (2011, methodology): “For example, Carless (1998, 2001) employed a second-order factor structure to examine alternate models of transformational leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ; Bass, 1985) and the Leadership Practice Inventory (LPI; Kouzes & Posner, 1995).”