Gender, Leadership Orientation, and Effectiveness: Testing the Theoretical Models of Bolman & Deal and Quinn
By Michael D. Thompson. 2000
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05a98a31eeb4636fd942bdc3283e4668a58335cd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Hans Luyten
- Peter J. C. Sleegers
- Lisa A. Boyce
- Dave B Marx
- G. Matkin
- Susan M. Fritz
- J. Barbuto
- A. Herd
In Gender Studies
In Social Psychology
- Peter J. C. Sleegers
- Lisa A. Boyce
- Dave B Marx
- G. Matkin
- Susan M. Fritz
- J. Barbuto
- A. Herd
- J. Scheerens
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of Gender, Education, and Age upon Leaders’ Use of Influence Tactics and Full Range Leadership Behaviors (2007, methodology): “Demographic variables such as gender, age, and educa tional level have been used to predict many behaviors, including effectiveness (Eagly, Karau, & Makhijani, 1995; Thompson, 2000), communication style (Kirtley & Weaver, 1999), decision making (Ganzel, 1999; Radecki & Jaccard, 1996), productivity (”
- Modeling the Influence of School Leaders on Student Achievement (2012, background): “Findings from research on effective leadership behavior in profit organizations suggest that the competing values framework is a valid model for analyzing effective leadership (Kalliath, Bluedorn, & Gillespie, 1999; Quinn & Spreitzer, 1991; Thompson, 2000).”
- The Relationship Between Gender Role Stereotypes and Requisite Military Leadership Characteristics (2003, background): “Transformational and charismatic approaches to leadership, which are seen as less incongruent with women’s roles than traditional masculine leadership approaches, might be especially appropriate during times of change and crisis, such as the war on terrorism (Carless, 1998; Conger & Kanungo, 1998; R”