DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF ORAL AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN THE ESL CLASSROOM

By Younghee Sheen. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2010

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/046362c6074470a8041814ca06fbcaef76d3a4aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

The Potential Role(s) of Writing in Second Language Development. (2012, background): “One recent exception is Sheen (2010), a study of the impact of oral and written feedback on accuracy of article production.”
Research into practice: Written corrective feedback (2012, unknown): “a comparison between their output and the WCF provided, and this can make it more likely for them to notice the gaps in their writing (Esteban & de Larios 2010; Sheen 2010; Van Beuningen 2010).”
The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing (2018, methodology): “Previous studies, however, have used feedback on single errors (e.g., Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Knoch, 2008, 2009a, 2010b; Sheen, 2007, 2010a) or if on multiple errors, the feedback was provided on one writing task (Ellis et al., 2008; Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Van Beuningen et al., 2012).”
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis (2015, background): “Sheen (2010) SL Lg program Intermediate Focused Direct 2 English Composition 17.”
The Nature of Feedback: How Peer Feedback Features Affect Students' Implementation Rate and Quality of Revisions. (2016, background): “…& Jernick, 2000) and motivate the receiver to respond to criticism (Bienstock et al., 2007; Hesketh & Laidlaw, 2002), too much emphasis on the positive features may lead learners of all ages to overlook criticism and overestimate their performance (Richardson, 2004; Schlecht, 2008; Shute, 2008).”
Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions (2010, background): “In writing, on the other hand, learners have enough time – and therefore cognitive resources – to compare their output with the CF they received, which increases the likelihood of learners noticing gaps in their interlanguage (e.g. Polio et al., 1998; Sheen, 2010a).”
Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy (2019, background): “To date, the majority of the focused feedback studies (e.g. Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Knoch, 2008, 2010a, 2010b; Ellis et al., 2008; Sheen, 2007, 2010; Sheen et al., 2009) have investigated specific functions of the English article system and found that groups who received corrective feedback…”