Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena
By G. Marbach‐Ad, Ruth Stavy. 2000
240 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/028f3105d2d8a363f5f739cc2b0dc6596b09a0ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Ravit Golan Duncan
- C. Tsui
- David F. Treagust
- M. Dikmenli
- Brian J. Reiser
- William A. Sandoval
- Manu Kapur
- Clark A. Chinn
In History and Philosophy of Science
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Domain-Specific Knowledge in Generative Reasoning About Complicated Multileveled Phenomena (2007, background): “Research by Marbach-Ad and Stavy (2000) found that high school students (ninth and twelfth 278 DUNCAN grade) had difficulty linking the micro (gene) and macro levels (trait) of genetic phenomena despite instruction about both levels.”
- Evaluating Secondary Students’ Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two‐Tier Diagnostic Instrument (2010, background): “First, he was able to reason across several levels of hierarchical organisation (Marbach-Ad & Stavy, 2000) to link new concepts, such as DNA, directly or indirectly to genes, chromosome and meiosis at several levels of representations.”
- Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis (2010, background): “A large number of prior studies reported that primary and secondary school students have many conceptional problems concerning cell biology and genetics (Flores et al., 2003; Lewis and Wood-Robinson, 2000; Marbach-Ad and Stavy, 2000).”
- Reasoning across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students' Understandings of Molecular Genetics. (2007, background): “…were mainly attributed to two aspects: the need to reason across multiple organization levels from the molecular to the macro scale (Horwitz, 1996; Marbach-Ad & Stavy, 2000), and the inaccessibility of these phenomena, especially at the molecular and micro levels, to our senses (Gilbert et al.,…”