S. Zaniboni

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2012–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom S. Zaniboni trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Thomas W. H. Ng
  2. J. Edwards
  3. F. Morgeson
  4. D. Feldman
  5. H. Zacher
  6. Stephen E. Humphrey
  7. T. Kristensen
  8. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
  9. D. Truxillo
  10. Pamela L. Perrewé

Who trusts S. Zaniboni overall

  1. Tomislav Hernaus
  2. H. Zacher

Papers from S. Zaniboni's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Zaniboni trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
  2. Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation
  3. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  6. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  7. UNDERSTANDING WORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORK (O*NET): IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH
  8. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  9. Job burnout. (Annual Review of Psychology)
  10. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. (Psychological methods)

Their papers