Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings 1
By K. Feldman. 2007
381 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b050e780c495f05bb7ab07335578c67ec98fe5a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- David Kember
- D. Leung
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
- O. Lüdtke
- Bert Brockx
- Traci Sitzmann
In Social Psychology
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Herbert W. Marsh
- O. Lüdtke
- Thomas Goetz
- U. Nett
- M. Keller
- Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
- D. Mortelmans
Citations in the corpus
- Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teaching: will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings? (2006, background): “As a result of his overview of several research studies, Feldman (1976, 1997) reports the existence of a modest but significant correlation between (expected) grading and student ratings of teacher effectiveness of between 0.10 and 0.30, while Centra (2003) believes the correlation averages are cl”
- Exposure to Effective Instruction and College Student Persistence: A Multi-Institutional Replication and Extension (2011, neutral): “1999; d’Apollonia & Abrami, 1997; Feldman, 1997; Greenwald and Gillmore, 1997; Marsh &”
- The Impact of Faculty and Staff on High-Risk College Student Persistence (2011, background): “Studies of exemplary faculty also highlight passion and enthusiasm for their work and for students, along with an ability to connect with students (Feldman, 1997; Light, 2001; Lowman, 1994; Stephenson, 2001).”
- Characteristics of teaching and students’ emotions in the classroom: Investigating differences across domains (2013, methodology): “…teaching characteristics could be described by two latent factors of teaching characteristics (cf., other approaches focusing on groups of teaching characteristics; e.g., Feldman, 2007; Hugener et al., 2009; Kunter & Baumert, 2006; Marsh, 1982, 1987, 2007; Murray, 1983; Seidel & Shavelson, 2007).”
- Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations? (2005, background): “Gigliotti and Buchtel (1990), Greenwald (1980), and Feldman (1997) have summarized psychological attribution studies that discuss these types of results.”
- Disciplinary Differences in Student Ratings of Teaching Quality (2011, background): “Several reviews have concurred that course evaluation questionnaires give quite reliable and valid measures of teaching effectiveness (Aleamoni 1999; Feldman 1996, 1997, 2007; Marsh 1987, 2007; Marsh and Dunkin 1997; McKeachie 1997).”
- Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (2009, neutral): “…others (Braskamp, Brandenburg, & Ory, 1985; Cashin, 1988; Centra, 1993; P. A. Cohen, 1980, 1981; Costin, Greenough, & Menges, 1971; de Wolf, 1974; Feldman , 1977, 1978, 1989a, 1989b, 1997; McKeachie, 1997; Remmers, 1963; Richardson, 2005; Rindermann, 1996) concluded that SETs based on…”
- On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Reviews and multisection studies suggest positive and moderate correlations between student grades and SET scores (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2009), varying between .10 and .47 (Cohen, 1981; Feldman, 1997).”
- A Century of Grading Research (2016, neutral): “Meta-analytic work (Centra & Creech, 1976; Feldman, 1997) suggests correlations between .10 and .30, or that anticipated grades account for less than 10% of the variance in course evaluations.”
- Self-Assessment of Knowledge: A Cognitive Learning or Affective Measure? (2010, background): “Extensive research has been conducted to examine whether SET are related to cognitive learning (e.g., Ambady & Rosenthal, 1993; Arreola, 2006; Centra & Gaubatz, 1998; Cohen, 1981; d’Apollonia & Abrami, 1997; Feldman, 2007; Greenwald, 1997; McKeachie, 1997).”