M. Haselton
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2000–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 15 papers; trusts 40 researchers and is trusted by 21 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 117 citations into it; #1,663 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,540 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 86 citations into it; #4,634 of 22,756 by trust here, #5,110 by citations
- Social Psychology — 55 citations into it; #8,516 of 15,694 by trust here, #5,773 by citations
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 42 citations into it; #2,110 of 10,852 by trust here, #2,652 by citations
- Clinical Psychology — 22 citations into it
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 22 citations into it; #5,514 of 6,648 by trust here, #4,453 by citations
- General Decision Sciences — 15 citations into it; #400 of 1,995 by trust here, #471 by citations
- Safety Research — 11 citations into it
Whom M. Haselton trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Daniel Kahneman
- Amos Tversky
- Steven W. Gangestad
- John G. Neuhoff
- David M. Buss
- Robert Kurzban
- Joseph Henrich
- Peter M. Todd
- D. Schmitt
Who trusts M. Haselton overall
- Ryan T McKay
- Mark Schaller
- Charles Efferson
- D. Kenrick
- Daniel Nettle
- Vladas Griskevicius
- Damian R. Murray
- D. Funder
- M. van Vugt
- Elizabeth G. Pillsworth
Papers from M. Haselton's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Haselton trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
- The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism (Behavioral and Brain Sciences)
- The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. (Evolution and human behavior)
- Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women
- Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating (Behavioral and Brain Sciences)
- A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
- A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. (Psychological bulletin)
- How the mind works
- The evolution of cooperation
- The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
Their papers
- Women's Sexual Strategies: The Evolution of Long-Term Bonds and Extrapair Sex (2006) — 98 citations
- The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. (2003) — 174 citations
- TARGET ARTICLE: Evolutionary Foundations of Cultural Variation: Evoked Culture and Mate Preferences (2006) — 203 citations
- Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias (2009) — 198 citations
- Evolution and the Social Mind : Evolutionary Psychology and Social Cognition (2011) — 129 citations
- The effect of the promiscuity stereotype on opposition to gay rights (2017) — 52 citations
- How valid are assessments of conception probability in ovulatory cycle research? Evaluations, recommendations, and theoretical implications (2016) — 198 citations
- Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national U.S. studies (2016) — 101 citations
- The Evolution of Cognitive Bias (2015) — 608 citations
- Love, desire, and the suppression of thoughts of romantic alternatives ☆ (2008) — 90 citations
- Desiring the Muscular Ideal: Men's Body Satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana (2007) — 383 citations
- Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention (2006) — 231 citations
- The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases (2006) — 804 citations
- The Evolution of Accuracy and Bias in Social Judgment (2004) — 96 citations
- Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Reversing figure and ground in the rationality debate: An evolutionary perspective (2000) — 268 citations