Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating
By D. Schmitt. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2005
889 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebb354e9466ca6fc675280d1c214599b5fecf6fe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- P. Jonason
- D. Schmitt
- David M. Buss
- Mark Schaller
- Norman P. Li
- Gregory D. Webster
- M. Haselton
- T. Shackelford
In Social Psychology
- Mark Schaller
- Susan T. Fiske
- Damian R. Murray
- P. Jonason
- D. Schmitt
- Peter Glick
- Steven L. Neuberg
- M. Del Giudice
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Individual differences in intrasexual competition (2009, background): “attractive men, relative to physically unattractive men, have been found to spend more time in mating effort and less time with kin (e.g., WAYNFORTH 1999; SCHMITT 2005).”
- Adaptive attentional attunement: evidence for mating-related perceptual bias (2007, background): “…orientation are generally inclined to engage in sexual partnerships without need for emotional commitment, men with a more restricted sociosexual orientation tend to require greater emotional commitment before engaging in a sexual partnership (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991; see also Schmitt, 2005).”
- The Fewer the Merrier?: Assessing Stigma Surrounding Consensually Non‐monogamous Romantic Relationships (2013, background): “According to Schmitt (2005), women and men embody inconsistent mating styles across cultures, suggesting that human beings are not built strictly for long-term mating.”
- The Development of Life History Strategies: Toward a Multi-Stage Theory (2010, background): “Finally, humans can enact “mixed” strategies, where parental investment and long-term commitment to one’s partner coexists with the occasional pursuit of short-term matings (see Del Giudice, 2009a ; Gangestad & Simpson, 2000 ; Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007 ; Schmitt, 2005 ).”
- The evolutionary genetics of personality (2007, background): “…can survive without so much paternal support (as in most agricultural and modern societies), the more risk-seeking 7R allele should be favoured by selection, as it leads to a personality more prone to sexual promiscuity and intrasexual competition (Gangestad & Simpson, 2000; Schmitt, 2005).”
- The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2010, neutral): “Human mating is best characterized as strategically flexible (Gangestad and Simpson, 2000), with a widely documented tendency for men to engage in higher mating effort than women (e.g., Schmitt, 2005).”
- Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy (2015, background): “, 2013; Perel, 2006), truly monogamous practices are nonnormative in the majority of the world’s societies (Schmitt, 2005).”
- The Theoretical Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology (2015, methodology): “It predicts and explains principled cross-cultural variation; for example, adaptations have been designed by selection to take relevant local conditions as input to produce output that is calibrated to local circumstances (e.g., Gaulin & Schlegel, 1980; Schmitt, 2005; Sznycer et al., 2012).”
- TARGET ARTICLE: Evolutionary Foundations of Cultural Variation: Evoked Culture and Mate Preferences (2006, positive): “Hence, the sex difference in preference for a mate with high access to resources may be muted in circumstances in which women participate more heavily in direct production (see also Schmitt, 2005).”