A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences.
By Wendy Wood, A. Eagly. Psychological bulletin, 2002
1,338 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62ce8eeb2dec41cf65390365f507022c553101f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- D. Schmitt
- David M. Buss
- Mark Schaller
- M. Haselton
- A. Eagly
- Wendy Wood
- Steve Stewart-Williams
- Amanda Diekman
In Social Psychology
- John Maltby
- P. Alex Linley
- Alex M. Wood
- S. Joseph
- Willibald F. Ruch
- T. Kashdan
- Martin E. P. Seligman
- Christopher Peterson
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Eagly
- D. Schmitt
- Amanda Diekman
- David M. Buss
- Wendy Wood
- Mark Schaller
- Sabine Sczesny
- M. Haselton
Citations in the corpus
- Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions (2003, background): “Thus, women’s pancultural desire for potential mates with resources can be seen as the reasoned consequence of inhabiting resource-depleted social structures, not a biological adaptation residing within women’s evolved mating psychology (Wood & Eagly, 2002).”
- Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five (2011, background): “Other theories suggest that gender norms are shaped by socio-cultural influences, such that women and men are expected to serve different roles in society and are therefore socialized to behave differently from one another (Wood and Eagly, 2002; Eagly and Wood, 2005).”
- The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence (2009, background): “, 2002; Burleson, 2003; Burleson and Mortenson, 2003) and emotional triggers (Markus and Kitayama, 1991; Liem et al., 2000; Wood and Eagly, 2002; Fischer et al., 2004).”
- Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review (2004, background): “SRT and SST also predict situational variations within each sex, but under different circumstances.”
- The Role of Masculinity/Femininity, Values, and Occupational Value Affordances in Shaping Young Men’s and Women’s Occupational Choices (2011, background): “Gender segregation may also constrain individuals’ occupational choices because it leads males and females to select occupations based on their gender rather than their interests and aptitudes (Gottfredson 1981; Liben and Bigler 2002; Wood and Eagly 2002 [cross-cultural data]).”
- Caring is Masculine: Stay-at-Home Fathers and Masculine Identity (2018, background): “For example, the biosocial theory (Wood & Eagly, 2002) purports that there are biological and social origins for traditional masculine roles; men are expected to be financial providers of their families, and this gender role is associated with being dominant and assertive.”
- TARGET ARTICLE: Evolutionary Foundations of Cultural Variation: Evoked Culture and Mate Preferences (2006, positive): “This learning presumably does not involve sex-differentiated learning processes but rather sex-differentiated inputs (Wood & Eagly, 2002; see also Eagly & Wood, 1999).”
- Gender, age and tenure as moderators of work-related stressors' relationships with job performance: A meta-analysis (2008, background): “Furthermore, according to the biosocial theory of the origins of gender differences in human behavior (Wood & Eagly, 2002), these differences appear in industrialized, as well as nonindustrial societies, and derive from the interaction between physical specialization of the sexes, especially the…”
- The Horizontal/Vertical Distinction in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research (2006, background): “Males are generally seen as more IND or independent than females, whereas females are seen as more COL or interdependent than males (e.g., Cross & Madson, 1997; Gilligan, 1982, 1986; Kitayama, Markus, Matsumoto, & Norasakkunkit, 1997; Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Wood & Eagly, 2002).”
- The Social Costs and Benefits of Anger as a Function of Gender and Relationship Context (2011, background): “In Western society men are more likely to assume the role of primary family provider, whereas women occupy the domestic role of homemaker and primary caretaker of children (Eagly 1987; Eagly and Wood 1999; Wood and Eagly 2002).”