The effect of the promiscuity stereotype on opposition to gay rights

By David Pinsof, M. Haselton. 2017

52 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Opposition to gay rights is prevalent in countries around the world. Recent correlational research suggests that opposition to gay rights may be driven by an interaction between one’s own short-term mating orientation (i.e. willingness to engage in casual sex) and representations of gay people as sexually promiscuous. Here, we experimentally manipulated representations of gay men by randomly assigning participants to read one of two versions of a fictitious newspaper article, one of which contained faux scientific evidence confirming the stereotype that gay men are promiscuous, and the other containing faux scientific evidence refuting the stereotype. We found that the manipulation interacted with short-term mating orientation (STMO) to predict opposition to gay rights, such that low-STMO individuals (i.e. more averse to casual sex) exhibited more support for gay rights when assigned to read the stereotype-refuting article compared to the stereotype-confirming article, whereas high-STMO individuals (i.e. less averse to casual sex) were not significantly influenced by the manipulation. We discuss the implications of these findings for the study of antigay attitudes, as well as for recent societal changes in acceptance of homosexuality.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Matt Gardner
  2. Margaret Mitchell

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Gabriel Ilharco
  2. Margaret Mitchell

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Ana Marasovic
  2. Margaret Mitchell

In Social Sciences & Humanities

  1. Ana Marasovic

Citations in the corpus