Larissa Shamseer

Statistics and Probability · 2012–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 245 citations into it; #7,575 of 12,932 by trust here, #349 by citations
• General Health Professions — 120 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 83 citations into it
• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 37 citations into it; #2,245 of 2,368 by trust here, #303 by citations
• History and Philosophy of Science — 23 citations into it

Whom Larissa Shamseer trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. David Moher
2. Douglas G. Altman
3. Julian P. T. Higgins
4. K. F. Schulz
5. A. Liberati
6. J. Tetzlaff
7. A. Chan
8. Matthew J. Page

Who trusts Larissa Shamseer overall

1. Matthew J. Page
2. Caroline Knight
3. David Moher
4. M. Charalampous
5. Jesús Valverde-Berrocoso
6. Phillipa McKeering
7. S. Valentine
8. Khalid Mahmood
9. Rowan T. Hughes
10. Guillaume Lamé

Papers from Larissa Shamseer's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Larissa Shamseer trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
2. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
3. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
4. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
5. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
6. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (British medical journal)
7. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
8. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
9. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
10. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)

Their papers

• Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015) — 18,904 citations
• Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012) — 595 citations
• Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015) — 15,705 citations
• PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 10,812 citations
• Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. (2012) — 754 citations
• Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (2020) — 2,634 citations
• The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 94,440 citations
• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2021) — 3,176 citations
• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) — 25,061 citations
• CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. (2017) — 1,950 citations