Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

By E. von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart J. Pocock, Peter C G�tzsche, Jan P. Vandenbroucke. British medical journal, 2007

44,764 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfb273bd868c23640dff6ac635821ca1e0c8db12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. (2012, methodology): “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement [23] and Tooth et al.”
Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010, methodology): “The criteria for assessing the quality of the studies were adapted from the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement([15]) and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.”
Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. (2015, methodology): “In order to assess the quality of reporting the STROBE checklist (Vandenbroucke et al. 2007; von Elm et al. 2008) was applied.”
Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016, methodology): “The criteria for assessing the risk of bias in the studies were adapted from the Strengthening the Reporting of Observation Studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement [41] and previous reviews in similar areas [2, 27].”
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009, neutral): “The epidemiology community has recently developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement for cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies [55,56].”
Meta-analysis: Natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity (2011, methodology): “Methodological quality of observational and diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed by the 22-item STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and the 25-item STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) check-lists, respectively (12,13).”
Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis (2013, methodology): “Study appraisal Two authors independently appraised the methodological quality of all included studies using a quality rating list based on previous checklists[20-23].”