The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
By Matthew J. Page, J. McKenzie, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, Tammy Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, S. Brennan and 16 more. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
3,176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f37de233cee350efdc5ecdd927f5d95906e628c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Sociology and Political Science
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review (2023, methodology): “Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the record selection process based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [11].”
- PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2021, methodology): “The PRISMA statement has been widely endorsed and adopted by journals, and evidence suggests use of the guideline is associated with more complete reporting of systematic reviews (Page et al., 2016).”
- Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2021, methodology): “This work was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines 2020.(18) Study selection, data extraction, and the”