Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes
By Allen R. McConnell, Jill M. Leibold. 2001
1,089 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/917ec48e46310d2d3e86a0e3b9c67d0c46c3d1ec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Bertram Gawronski
- David M. Amodio
- John F. Dovidio
- J. de Houwer
- Wilhelm Hofmann
- J. Richeson
- Galen Bodenhausen
In Social Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Brian A. Nosek
- David M. Amodio
- Galen Bodenhausen
- A. Greenwald
- Laurie A. Rudman
- John F. Dovidio
In Sociology and Political Science
- Bertram Gawronski
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Brian A. Nosek
- A. Greenwald
- J. de Houwer
- Malte Friese
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Wilhelm Hofmann
Citations in the corpus
- Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention (2012, neutral): “…evidence reveals that implicit biasesarelinkedtodiscriminatoryoutcomesrangingfromtheseeming-ly mundane, such as poorer quality interactions (McConnell & Leibold, 2001), to the undeniably consequential, such as constrained employment opportunities (Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2004) and a…”
- Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, background): “When they do correlate, even uncorrected for attenuation (e.g., Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001; Maison, Greenwald, & Bruin, 2001; McConnell & Leibold, 2001), this may reflect situations where the base rate p(A) is relatively high (e.g., strong attitudes towards presidential candidates; Nosek, Banaji,…”
- The Relationship Between Level of Training, Implicit Bias, and Multicultural Competency Among Counselor Trainees (2008, background): “Finally, interpersonal ratings made by African Americans who engaged in interethnic interactions with European American participants were predicted by the European American’s level of implicit bias (McConnell & Leibold, 2001).”
- Stereotypes, Bias, and Personnel Decisions: Strange and Stranger (2008, background): “There is little evidence to show any connection between this proposed tendency and actual behavior (McConnell & Leibold, 2001).”
- The self-importance of moral identity. (2002, result): “…though, that the magnitude of both these correlations is comparable to those found in other research investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit measures of racial attitudes (McConnell & Leibold, 2001) and implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
- Unconscious Racism: A Concept in Pursuit of a Measure (2008, background): “…IAT scores among white participants predicted more positive interactions with black students (as rated by the black students themselves), whereas McConnell & Leibold (2001) found that these same scores predicted more negative interactions by white participants interacting with a black…”
- The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias (2004, neutral): “…interactions (Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; Dovidio, Kawakami , Johnson, Johnson, & Howard, 1997; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; McConnell & Leibold, 2001; Richeson & Shelton, 2003), attitudes generated by ideological prompts such as those employed in the present work are not…”
- Societal and Managerial Implications of Implicit Social Cognition: Why Milliseconds Matter (2004, neutral): “McConnell and Leibold (2001) were among the first to test the IAT’s usefulness in predicting the types of behaviors that would occur in these sorts of organizational interactions.”
- Minority Members' Implicit Attitudes: Automatic Ingroup Bias As A Function Of Group Status (2002, background): “For example, IAT–assessed anti–black attitudes predicted subjects’ friendliness during an interview with a black experimenter, whereas self–reported prejudice did not (McConnell & Leibold, 2001).”
- The Obama effect: Decreasing implicit prejudice and stereotyping (2009, background): “For example, McConnell and Leibold (2001) found that anti-Black implicit prejudice was associated with avoidant non-verbal behavior (e.g., reduced eye contact, increased interpersonal distance).”
- From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects (2010, background): “Showing an impact on implicit attitudes is also important because while explicit attitudes are associated with deliberative behaviours, implicit measures are associated with more subtle, indirect and spontaneous non-verbal behaviours (e.g., McConnell & Leibold, 2001).”
- Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. (2003, neutral): “…& Mücke, 2002; Ashburn-Nardo, Voils, & Monteith, 2001; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Gawronski, 2002; Greenwald et al., 2002; Greenwald & Nosek, 2001; McConnell & Leibold, 2001; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002b; Rudman, Feinberg, & Fairchild, 2002), although some alternative interpretations have…”
- Communication and Attitude Change: Causes, Processes, and Effects (2005, result): “In another study examining the relationship between discriminatory behavior and implicit and explicit measures of racial attitudes, McConnell and Leibold (2001) found that more favorable evaluations of Whites in comparison to African Americans on the Implicit Association Test (IAT) were predictive o”