Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance

By Denise Sekaquaptewa, M. Thompson. 2003

403 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b83de491bec3398b04d73065a9406ce160f6fa29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Do Female and Male Role Models Who Embody STEM Stereotypes Hinder Women’s Anticipated Success in STEM? (2011, background): “A skewed gender ratio can activate negative stereotypes about women’s abilities and bring about underperformance among women who have identified those domains as important to them (e.g., STEM majors; Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev, 2000; Murphy, Steele, & Gross, 2007; Sekaquaptewa & Thompson, 2003).”
Do High-Achieving Female Students Underperform in Private? The Implications of Threatening Environments on Intellectual Processing (2003, background): “ Sekaquaptewa and Thompson (2003) , for example, showed that solo status can affect performance on a public oral test and speculated that it would be ineffective on private performances.”
Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures (2017, background): “Sekaquaptewa and Thompson (2003), for example, found that solo women in a gender-diverse team performed worse than nonsolo women on a math task.”
The social psychology of stigma. (2005, background): “…AR231-PS56-15.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: IKH 400 MAJOR O’BRIEN members of nonstigmatized groups (Ben-Zeev et al. 2004, Inzlicht & Good 2004, Sekaquaptewa & Thompson 2003), being taught by an instructor who is a member of a dominant outgroup (Marx & Roman 2002), being exposed to media…”
Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. (2003, methodology): “To prime and maintain the salience of stereotype threat during the completion of the working memory test, we adapted procedures used by Inzlicht and Ben-Zeev (2000; see also Sekaquaptewa & Thompson, 2003) to test the effects of solo gender status on women’s math performance.”
The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields (2012, positive): “…to academic environments that can produce stereotype threat, from being in the numerical minority (e.g., being the only woman in an engineering class; Inzlicht and Ben-Zeev 2000; Sekaquaptewa and Thompson 2003) to interacting with someone who likely holds negative stereotypes (Logel et al. 2009).”
How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science (2014, background): “However, that study was unable to rule out the possibility that the decision to hire fewer women is the rational response to the lower effective quality of women ’ s future performance because of underinvestment by women caused by inferior career prospects (18, 19) or stereotype threat (20).”
Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others? (2017, positive): “Stereotype threat can be induced when women are underrepresented in a situation (Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev, 2000; Murphy, Steele, & Gross, 2007; Sekaquaptewa & Thompson, 2003; Shaffer, Marx, & Prislin, 2013), suggesting that women may experience stereotype threat more often in fields in which the…”
Is Stereotype Threat a Useful Construct for Organizational Psychology Research and Practice? (2014, background): “For example, the proportion of other women in a setting has been shown to affect feelings of stereotype threat (Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev, 2000; Sekaquaptewa & Thompson, 2003), and thus the underrepresentation of women in different settings might lead women to feel that they do not belong in that context.”
The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Role Adoption in Student Teams (2013, neutral): “American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637-644.”