Diana C. Mutz

Sociology and Political Science · 2005–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 42 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 13 citations into it; #3,437 of 22,756 by trust here, #5,668 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 9 citations into it; #12,493 of 23,481 by trust here, #18,597 by citations
• Political Science and International Relations — 8 citations into it; #114 of 4,701 by trust here, #440 by citations
• Social Psychology — 5 citations into it
• Strategy and Management — 5 citations into it

Whom Diana C. Mutz trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Edwin Mansfield
2. Michael I. Norton
3. Felix Danbold
4. A. Baker
5. John T. Jost
6. K. Stenner
7. Robert D. Putnam
8. Joel Sobel
9. Steven N. Durlauf
10. Soumyananda Dinda

Who trusts Diana C. Mutz overall

1. Emily A. Thorson
2. D. J. Brooks
3. Jordi Muñoz
4. Luke W. Miratrix
5. Kevin J. Mullinix
6. Maria Abascal
7. Yotam Margalit
8. Seung Hyun Kim
9. R. Tormos
10. Jens Hainmueller

Papers from Diana C. Mutz's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Diana C. Mutz trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Why is Trade Reform so Popular in Latin America?: A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences
2. Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
3. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. (Psychological bulletin)
4. Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis (International Organization)
5. No Longer “All-American”? Whites’ Defensive Reactions to Their Numerical Decline
6. Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety (International Organization)
7. An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice
8. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work)
9. An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.
10. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism

Their papers

• Social Trust and E-Commerce Experimental Evidence for the Effects of Social Trust on Individuals’ Economic Behavior (2005) — 142 citations
• Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety (2009) — 673 citations
• Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote (2018) — 914 citations
• Population-Based Survey Experiments (2011) — 737 citations