Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety

By Edwin Mansfield, Diana C. Mutz. International Organization, 2009

673 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e9befba20a6c382c2a37b2564eba15eb170b428

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalization Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences* (2015, result): “Figure 1 shows that the empirical implications of the traditional trade models differ from those of the model introduced in this article.”
Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment (2010, methodology): “…have been considered, assuming the government must balance its budget: a change in tax rates and a change in per capita transfers (see Facchini and Mayda 2009).7 In the most commonly studied scenario, assuming the government adjusts tax rates while keeping per capita transfers constant, the…”
When European integration becomes costly: the euro crisis and public support for European economic governance (2014, background): “For the United States (US), Mansfield and Mutz (2009) find that negative attitudes towards outgroups are significantly 626 Journal of European Public Policy associated with hostility towards free trade.”
How Can Economic Interests Influence Support for Free Trade? (2012, methodology): “Our second objection is that economic interest might influence individual attitudes in ways other than conscious calculations of self-interest+ As we noted earlier, these calculations are the only causal pathway consistent with the definition of self-interest used in the research on which most skept”
Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote (2018, background): “Rising SDO accounted for another 0.01 increase in the probability of voting for the Republican candidate.”