Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.

By John T. Jost, Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, F. J. Sulloway. Psychological bulletin, 2003

4,522 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51b2f29ac0231f0c5426e527fd760592c5fe5f31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself. (2009, background): “The motivation to protectfeelings of self-worth can also lead to a rigid, closed mind-set that cannot tolerate alternative viewpoints known as ‘‘need for cognitive closure’’ ( Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003; Taris, 2000).”
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection (2013, methodology): “But while such an explanation would “fit” the results of the study, it would not be particularly supportive of the “asymmetry thesis” premise (Jost et al., 2003; Nam et al., 2013) that conservatives are peculiarly vulnerable to ideologically motivated reasoning.”
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007, neutral): “From classic and contemporary works about the authoritarian personality (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, & Sanford, 1950; Altemeyer, 1996, 1998) to psychological perspectives on motivated social cognition (Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003), a consistent expectation is that, compared to”
How Ideological Migration Geographically Segregates Groups (2014, neutral): “implies the core values that span most of a person's moral worldview and that there are important differences between people who adhere to one worldview or another (Graham et al., 2013; Jost et al., 2003; Jost, 2009).”
Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. (2005, methodology): “This is an intuitively sensible approach, and it is consistent with an individual differences approach to predicting support for the system (e.g., Altemeyer, 1998; Crandall, 2000; Glick & Fiske, 1996; Jost & Burgess, 2000; Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003; Lambert & Raichle, 2000; Pratto”
Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise (2017, background): “Conservative political ideas are adopted because they provide comfort for those who are made anxious by change and instability (Jost et al. 2003), serving the function of defensive coping (Hobfoll, Canetti-Nisim, and Johnson 2006).”
The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis (2014, background): “…indicated that conservatives may have cognitive styles and personality traits (e.g., higher need for closure; lower openness to experience) that may make them more likely to engage in motivated information processing (e.g., Jost et al., 2003), this is not necessarily the case (e.g., Kahan, 2013).”
The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart?☆ (2011, background): “…conservatives have been shown to be less comfortable with system instability, more intolerant of ambiguity/uncertainty, more vulnerable to death anxiety, have a stronger fear of threat/loss, and display a stronger need for order/ structure/closure than liberals (Jost et al., 2003, 2008).”
Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? (2016, background): “Psychological and polit- ical orientation — the left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003).”
System Justification, Right-Wing Conservatism, and Internalized Homophobia: Gay and Lesbian Attitudes toward Same-Sex Parenting in Italy (2011, background): “This is consistent with the notion that political conservatism is an ideology that emphasizes traditionalism (or resistance to change) and acceptance (or justification) of inequality (Jost et al. 2003).”
How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. (2009, background): “It is not surprising, therefore, that a recent meta-analysis (Jost et al., 2003; Jost et al., 2003) suggests that people who are “politically conservative” (e.”