A. Sutton
Statistics and Probability · British medical journal · 2000–2019
A researcher in the Science corpus: 27 papers; trusts 37 researchers and is trusted by 43 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 173 citations into it; #1,756 of 12,932 by trust here, #102 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 48 citations into it
- General Health Professions — 33 citations into it
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 33 citations into it
- Artificial Intelligence — 22 citations into it
- Surgery — 18 citations into it
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism — 14 citations into it
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 8 citations into it
Whom A. Sutton trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- David J. Spiegelhalter
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- J. Sterne
- J. Deeks
- R. Rosenthal
- S. Dias
- Richard L. Tweedie
- Matthias Egger
- Denise Draper
- N. Duan
Who trusts A. Sutton overall
- J. Peters
- W. Viechtbauer
- Ralf Schulze
- Philipp Heimberger
- Dan Jackson
- Jeroen P. Jansen
- B. Demena
- J. Copas
- T. Stanley
- Ian R. White
Papers from A. Sutton's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers A. Sutton trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
- The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
- How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
- Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
- BAYESIAN THEORY
- Generalized Linear Models
Their papers
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS (2005) — 533 citations
- What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. (2004) — 1,624 citations
- Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011) — 6,663 citations
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2013) — 1,122 citations
- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. (2010) — 995 citations
- Predicting costs over time using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods: an application to early inflammatory polyarthritis. (2007) — 54 citations
- Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000) — 1,399 citations
- Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. (2008) — 1,832 citations
- Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between‐study heterogeneity (2007) — 688 citations
- Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2006) — 775 citations
- Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. (2006) — 2,094 citations
- Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. (2001) — 445 citations
- How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006) — 895 citations
- Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. (2005) — 1,214 citations
- Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (2006) — 1,338 citations
- Use of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods to Model Cost-of-Illness Data (2003) — 36 citations
- In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias. (2014) — 714 citations
- MetaInsight: An interactive web‐based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta‐analyses using R‐shiny and netmeta (2019) — 335 citations
- Study quality assessment tools (2016) — 1,500 citations
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013) — 360 citations