Francine Dehue

Social Psychology · 2008–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Francine Dehue trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. A. Høgh
  2. Kristopher J Preacher
  3. Staale Einarsen
  4. M. Vartia
  5. Cary L. Cooper
  6. Michael Frese
  7. Michele L. Ybarra
  8. A. Rodríguez-Muñoz
  9. Dieter Zapf
  10. H. Hoel

Who trusts Francine Dehue overall

  1. Allison M. Schenk
  2. Mairéad Foody
  3. Krista R. Mehari
  4. Robert S. Tokunaga
  5. Trijntje Völlink
  6. E. Makri-Botsari
  7. William J. Fremouw
  8. Robin M. Kowalski
  9. Maite Garaigordobil
  10. Muthanna Samara

Papers from Francine Dehue's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Francine Dehue trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models (Behavior Research Methods)
  2. Coping with bullying in the workplace
  3. Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. (Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health)
  4. Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions (Multivariate Behavioral Research)
  5. Cyberbullying: Youngsters' Experiences and Parental Perception (Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking)
  6. Individual Consequences of Workplace Bullying/Mobbing
  7. Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors.
  8. Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. (Developmental Psychology)
  9. Post‐Traumatic Symptoms Among Victims of Workplace Bullying: Exploring Gender Differences and Shattered Assumptions
  10. Revisions and further developments of the Occupational Stress Indicator: LISREL results from four Dutch studies

Their papers