Nathan Walter

Sociology and Political Science · 2018–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 25 researchers and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Nathan Walter trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Dan Jackson
  2. Brendan Nyhan
  3. L. Hedges
  4. Mike W.-L. Cheung
  5. Rebecca M. Turner
  6. Jason Reifler
  7. H. Blank
  8. Adam J. Berinsky
  9. Chanthika Pornpitakpan
  10. Xiao-Hua Zhou

Who trusts Nathan Walter overall

  1. Leticia Bode
  2. Emily K. Vraga
  3. J. Roozenbeek
  4. Dominik A. Stecuła
  5. S. van der Linden
  6. John J. Brooks
  7. Brendan Nyhan
  8. Camille J. Saucier
  9. Ozan Kuru
  10. Stephan Lewandowsky

Papers from Nathan Walter's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Nathan Walter trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The case for motivated reasoning.
  2. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
  3. Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
  4. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
  5. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
  6. Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation
  7. Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation
  8. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
  9. Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation (British Journal of Political Science)
  10. Displacing Misinformation about Events: An Experimental Test of Causal Corrections (Journal of Experimental Political Science)

Their papers