Jason Reifler

Sociology and Political Science · 2006–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 43 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 104 citations into it; #966 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,114 by citations
• Political Science and International Relations — 42 citations into it; #129 of 4,701 by trust here, #103 by citations
• Communication — 41 citations into it; #3,418 of 3,460 by trust here, #756 by citations
• Social Psychology — 19 citations into it
• Artificial Intelligence — 13 citations into it
• Safety Research — 13 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 10 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 7 citations into it

Whom Jason Reifler trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Larry M. Bartels
2. A. Gerber
3. Brendan Nyhan
4. David P. Redlawsk
5. Ziva Kunda
6. Charles Taber
7. Brian E. Weeks
8. Milton Lodge
9. Donald P. Green
10. Gordon Pennycook

Who trusts Jason Reifler overall

1. Emily K. Vraga
2. Ullrich K. H. Ecker
3. Leticia Bode
4. Gordon Pennycook
5. Nathan Walter
6. Brendan Nyhan
7. Brian E. Weeks
8. Stephan Lewandowsky
9. Kevin Munger
10. S. van der Linden

Papers from Jason Reifler's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jason Reifler trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The case for motivated reasoning.
2. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
3. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
4. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. (Psychological bulletin)
5. Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making (Journal of Politics)
6. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence
7. Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns
8. They saw a game: a case study. (Journal of Abnormal Psychology)
9. How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment (American Political Science Review)
10. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation

Their papers

• When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions (2010) — 2,649 citations
• A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India (2020) — 622 citations
• Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability (2019) — 386 citations
• Displacing Misinformation about Events: An Experimental Test of Causal Corrections (2015) — 117 citations
• The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics (2017) — 869 citations
• Let's Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War (2011) — 168 citations
• The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions (2019) — 145 citations
• The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections (2021) — 124 citations
• Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial (2014) — 1,150 citations
• FOREIGN POLICY AND THE ELECTORAL CONNECTION (2006) — 337 citations