John Cook

Sociology and Political Science · PLoS ONE · 2013–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom John Cook trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Stephan Lewandowsky
  2. Y. Heath
  3. S. van der Linden
  4. Brendan Nyhan
  5. Christine D. Tippett
  6. Emily A. Thorson
  7. Ullrich K. H. Ecker
  8. M. Boykoff
  9. W. Landman
  10. Andrew F. Hayes

Who trusts John Cook overall

  1. S. van der Linden
  2. Gordon Pennycook
  3. Emily K. Vraga
  4. J. Roozenbeek
  5. Stephan Lewandowsky
  6. J. Compton
  7. R. Maertens
  8. David G. Rand
  9. Leticia Bode
  10. Melisa Basol

Papers from John Cook's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers John Cook trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
  2. The spread of true and false news online
  3. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence (PLoS ONE)
  4. The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (PLoS ONE)
  5. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
  6. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus
  7. Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate (American Journal of Public Health)
  8. Motivated Rejection of Science
  9. Reply to Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’
  10. Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation

Their papers