J. Roozenbeek

Sociology and Political Science · 2019–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 36 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom J. Roozenbeek trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. S. van der Linden
  2. Melisa Basol
  3. Gordon Pennycook
  4. Nathan Walter
  5. A. Guess
  6. John Cook
  7. Stephan Lewandowsky
  8. James Price Dillard
  9. James W. Pennebaker
  10. Anthony Leiserowitz

Who trusts J. Roozenbeek overall

  1. S. van der Linden
  2. Stephan Lewandowsky
  3. J. Compton
  4. Melisa Basol
  5. Thomas Nygren
  6. Esma Aïmeur
  7. John Cook
  8. Gordon Pennycook
  9. Zhijiang Guo
  10. Costas Panagopoulos

Papers from J. Roozenbeek's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Roozenbeek trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The spread of true and false news online
  2. The science of fake news
  3. The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
  4. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence (PLoS ONE)
  5. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
  6. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation (Psychology Science)
  7. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
  8. In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media
  9. Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News (Journal of Cognition)
  10. Pausing to consider why a headline is true or false can help reduce the sharing of false news (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review)

Their papers