J. Roozenbeek
Sociology and Political Science · 2019–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 36 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Sociology and Political Science — 143 citations into it; #3,811 of 22,756 by trust here, #3,459 by citations
- Communication — 63 citations into it; #654 of 3,460 by trust here, #601 by citations
- Artificial Intelligence — 27 citations into it
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 26 citations into it; #6,700 of 10,852 by trust here, #8,619 by citations
- Literature and Literary Theory — 26 citations into it; #496 of 2,496 by trust here, #278 by citations
- Health — 22 citations into it
- Social Psychology — 19 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 12 citations into it
Whom J. Roozenbeek trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- S. van der Linden
- Melisa Basol
- Gordon Pennycook
- Nathan Walter
- A. Guess
- John Cook
- Stephan Lewandowsky
- James Price Dillard
- James W. Pennebaker
- Anthony Leiserowitz
Who trusts J. Roozenbeek overall
- S. van der Linden
- Stephan Lewandowsky
- J. Compton
- Melisa Basol
- Thomas Nygren
- Esma Aïmeur
- John Cook
- Gordon Pennycook
- Zhijiang Guo
- Costas Panagopoulos
Papers from J. Roozenbeek's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Roozenbeek trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The spread of true and false news online
- The science of fake news
- The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
- Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence (PLoS ONE)
- Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
- Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation (Psychology Science)
- Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
- In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media
- Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News (Journal of Cognition)
- Pausing to consider why a headline is true or false can help reduce the sharing of false news (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review)
Their papers
- The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation (2019) — 401 citations
- Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation (2019) — 563 citations
- Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News (2020) — 304 citations
- Prebunking interventions based on the psychological theory of “inoculation” can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. (2020) — 152 citations
- You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news (2020) — 200 citations
- Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world (2020) — 1,163 citations
- Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation (2021) — 223 citations
- The Debunking Handbook 2020 (2020) — 188 citations
- Breaking Harmony Square: A game that “inoculates” against political misinformation (2020) — 120 citations