Shani Pindek

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Shani Pindek trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jose M. Cortina
  2. Paul E. Spector
  3. Cong Liu
  4. Sabine Sonnentag
  5. Reeshad S. Dalal
  6. S. Fox
  7. Michael K. Lindell
  8. J. Conway
  9. Jeffrey LePine
  10. Philip M. Podsakoff

Who trusts Shani Pindek overall

  1. Antonia J. Kaluza
  2. Paul E. Spector
  3. Diana Boer
  4. Claudia Buengeler

Papers from Shani Pindek's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Shani Pindek trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  2. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  3. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?
  6. A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression (Multivariate Behavioral Research)
  7. A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework: An Explanation for Inconsistent Relationships Among Stressors and Performance
  8. What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
  9. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  10. Apples and Oranges (and Pears, Oh My!): The Search for Moderators in Meta-Analysis

Their papers