Lamar Pierce

Safety Research · 2009–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 22 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Lamar Pierce trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Steven Klepper
  2. Maurice E. Schweitzer
  3. Constance E. Helfat
  4. S. G. Winter
  5. Linda Klebe Treviño
  6. Olav Sorenson
  7. Henk Aarts
  8. Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart
  9. Peter Thompson
  10. Jonathan Haidt

Who trusts Lamar Pierce overall

  1. Francesca Gino
  2. Kevin J. Boudreau
  3. Catrine Jacobsen
  4. Scott S. Wiltermuth
  5. Rebecca L. Greenbaum
  6. Max H. Bazerman
  7. Oliver Schilke
  8. Sara Lowes
  9. Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos Gomes
  10. Barney Tan

Papers from Lamar Pierce's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Lamar Pierce trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. (Psychology Review)
  2. A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business
  3. The case for motivated reasoning.
  4. Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review
  5. The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  6. How (and where) does moral judgment work? (Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  7. Goal Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior
  8. The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  9. 13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
  10. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. (Journal of Applied Psychology)

Their papers