Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?

By Amy J. Hillman, Gerald D. Keim. 2001

3,744 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a8d5a5329270b749f6d9f8fc6cda026e2605ab3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Institutional Drivers for Corporate Social Responsibility in an Emerging Economy: A Mixed-Method Study of Chinese Business Executives (2017, background): “As argued by Hillman and Keim (2001), these studies pay inadequate attention to the multidimensional nature of the CSR construct.”
Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis (2010, background): “408–409), one approach frequently pursued was to interpret activities and outcomes relating to CSR and environmental management in their totality as predictors of and, hence, a proxy for CSP (e.g. Dyer and Whetten, 2006; GarciaCastro et al., 2009; Hillman and Keim, 2001; Orlitzky, 2001; Waddock and ”
Examining the Link between Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: An Analysis of the Best Corporate Citizens (2013, background): “Because these measures have been widely used in a number of prominent studies (Graves and Waddock, 1994; Hillman and Keim, 2001; Coombs and Gilley, 2005; Choi and Wang, 2009) we do not describe in detail the activities included in these measures.”
How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? (2011, methodology): “Using a multi-theoretical framework which combines stakeholder and resource-based perspectives (RBP) (Hillman and Keim, 2001; Surroca, 2010; Wahba, 2008), a set of hypotheses are developed that relate the market value of equity with CSP, considering the interaction of size and profitability with CSP”
Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil (2011, background): “…stakeholders of the corporation may improve firm image and reputation, and that firm’s concerns about such interests are able to affect positively firm’s productivity, financial performance and value creation (Hillman and Keim, 2001, Donaldson and Preston, 1995, Bowman and Haire, 1975, Wood, 1991).”