C. Moss‐Racusin

Sociology and Political Science · 2008–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 52 researchers and is trusted by 20 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 129 citations into it; #2,827 of 22,756 by trust here, #794 by citations
• Gender Studies — 113 citations into it; #424 of 4,924 by trust here, #87 by citations
• Social Psychology — 64 citations into it; #8,691 of 15,694 by trust here, #4,311 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 20 citations into it
• Social Sciences & Humanities — 15 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 14 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 13 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 11 citations into it; #1,939 of 3,868 by trust here, #2,505 by citations

Whom C. Moss‐Racusin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Laurie A. Rudman
2. M. Heilman
3. Deborah A. Prentice
4. A. Eagly
5. E. Tory Higgins
6. Kimberly A. Neuendorf
7. J. Mattis
8. J. Phelan
9. Brian A. Nosek
10. David P. MacKinnon

Who trusts C. Moss‐Racusin overall

1. Laurie A. Rudman
2. Victoria L. Brescoll
3. N. Ellemers
4. Andrea C. Vial
5. Sarah Thébaud
6. Rachael D. Robnett
7. Sapna Cheryan
8. Ming-Te Wang
9. Ali Mohammadi
10. D. Teele

Papers from C. Moss‐Racusin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Moss‐Racusin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation
2. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
3. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (Psychology Review)
4. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site
5. Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research
6. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain
7. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
8. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
9. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder.
10. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)

Their papers

• Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. (2012) — 1,026 citations
• Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012) — 2,920 citations
• When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. (2010) — 516 citations
• Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women (2008) — 317 citations
• Disruptions in Women's Self-Promotion: The Backlash Avoidance Model 1 (2010) — 230 citations
• Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields (2015) — 90 citations
• Gender Bias Produces Gender Gaps in STEM Engagement (2018) — 133 citations
• Gender Differences in Work-Family Guilt in Parents of Young Children (2017) — 154 citations
• When Do We Confront? Perceptions of Costs and Benefits Predict Confronting Discrimination on Behalf of the Self and Others (2012) — 109 citations