Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation
By A. Eagly. 1987
Subfields: AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
- Laurie A. Rudman
- Amanda Diekman
- E. King
- Agneta H. Fischer
- D. Schmitt
- Sabine Sczesny
- Rosanna E. Guadagno
- Peter Glick
Citations in the corpus
- Hi, my name is Martha: Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue models (2021, background): “A’s name is “real” (see Lieberson and Mikelson 1995; Figlio 2005; Brown and Lively 2012).6 Lastly, since occupations are one of the commonly researched gender proxies in NLP (Caliskan et al., 2017; Rudinger et al., 2018; Webster et al., 2020), we measured the extent to which Speaker A’s templated…”
- Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D) (2010, background): “…caused, not only by biological differences, but also by gender-role orientation and characteristics associated with gender (feminine traits, such as socially desirable behavior and friendliness; and masculine traits, such as dominance, competitiveness, and aggression; see Bem, 1981; Eagly, 1987).”
- Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. (2007, background): “Regarding group perception and stereotypes, gender stereotypes are expressed on two basic dimensions, with agency being related to the male stereotype and communion being related to the female one (Bem, 1974; Eagly, 1987; Spence, Helmreich, & Stapp, 1974).”
- Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences (2015, methodology): “Drawing upon the privacy calculus model (Dinev & Hart, 2006a), justice theory (Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, 2001), self determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), and social role theory (Eagly, 1987), this study attempts to address the aforementioned three issues respectively.”
- Schedule flexibility and stress: Linking formal flexible arrangements and perceived flexibility to employee health (2008, background): “Social role theory suggests that women and men acquire different beliefs and skills because they occupy distinct roles in society, and that these beliefs and skills carry over into the way women and men evaluate the resources and demands in their work and family lives (Eagly, 1987; Pleck, 1977).”
- Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles (2001, background): “Research on gender role expectations suggests that observed gender differences are often a function of the divergent social roles and societal expectations for women and men (Eagly, 1987).”
- Perceptions of Discrimination and Justice (2005, background): “According to this theory, women and men tend to differ in a wide range of social behaviors in social contexts in which gender roles are salient (Eagly, 1987).”
- Making Gender Comparisons More Meaningful: A Call for More Attention to Social Context (2003, background): “Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Eagly, A. H. (1994). On comparing women and men. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 513–522. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men.”
- Gender Stereotypes and the Attribution of Leadership Traits: A Cross-Cultural Comparison (2004, background): “From a sociocultural perspective, stereotypes about women and men are based on observations of their behaviors in gender-typical social roles (e.g., breadwinner and homemaker) and contain consensual beliefs about the attributes of women and men ( Eagly, 1987 ).”
- The Role of Masculinity/Femininity, Values, and Occupational Value Affordances in Shaping Young Men’s and Women’s Occupational Choices (2011, background): “However, it is also possible that the genders that occupy the careers shape perceptions of value affordances as social role theory might suggest ( Eagly 1987 ).”