Looking beyond resources: Exploring the importance of entrepreneurship to firm-level competitive advantage in technologically intensive industries

By Scott L. Newbert, S. Gopalakrishnan, Bruce A. Kirchhoff. 2008

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffb72af770ceb3398c5a4123251e2a3dcd2552b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Sarah Cooper
2. Richard J. Arend

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Johanna Vanderstraeten
2. Sarah Cooper
3. Richard J. Arend
4. P. Matthyssens
5. D. Pittino
6. F. Visintin
7. Mirva Peltoniemi
8. Ola Laaksonen

In Strategy and Management

1. Sarah Cooper
2. Richard J. Arend
3. Johanna Vanderstraeten
4. P. Matthyssens
5. D. Pittino
6. F. Visintin

Citations in the corpus

• Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment (2012, background): “Newbert et al. (2008) also link the RBV to a dynamic capabilities approach and show that both the possession and exploitation of resources through an optimal use of capabilities are necessary to attain competitive advantages.”
• Industry placement, authentic experience and the development of venturing and technology self-efficacy (2009, background): “Strategic choices, like a decision to enter new markets, were once largely initiated and led by top management (Newbert et al. 2008), and research and the development of new knowledge was dominated by internal research organisations (van de Vrande et al.”
• Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship (2012, methodology): “…from previous surveys concerning entrepreneurship, dynamic capabilities, and firm performance (e.g., Covin and Slevin 1989; Lumpkin and Dess 2001; Menguc and Auh 2006; Miller and Friesen 1982; Newbert 2005; Newbert et al. 2008; Sher and Lee 2004; Wu 2006; Yalcinkaya et al. 2007; Zahra et al. 2002).”
• Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies (2014, background): “…are widely recognized as key drivers of start-up performance in technology-based sectors (e.g. Colombo and Grilli, 2010; Newbert et al., 2007; Newbert et al., 2008), relatively few studies on USOs focus on the performance of new ventures by considering the features of entrepreneurial…”