Interorganizational Cognition and Interpretation
By Joseph Porac, M. Ventresca, Yuri Mishina. 2002
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdf09bc7ceea90e07c35bc39c80e8238ef621800
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Henrikki Tikkanen
- Juha-Antti Lamberg
- F. V. D. van den Bosch
- Henk W. Volberda
- Gino Cattani
- Paul W. L. Vlaar
- Juha-Pekka Kallunki
- Kerem Gurses
In Strategy and Management
- Henk W. Volberda
- Henrikki Tikkanen
- Juha-Antti Lamberg
- F. V. D. van den Bosch
- Gino Cattani
- Joseph Porac
- Petri Parvinen
- Paul W. L. Vlaar
Citations in the corpus
- Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense (2006, background): “They lead participants to interpret and understand the same phenomena differently (Porac et al. 2002; Sutcliffe and Huber 1998; Vaara 2003).”
- Entrepreneurship in Regulated Markets: Framing Contests and Collective Action to Introduce Pay TV in the U.S. (2014, background): “…and Fiol, 1994; Rindova and Fombrun, 1999), unclear product definitions, industry structure and dependence relationships (Hargadon and Douglas, 2001; Ozcan and Santos, 2014; Santos and Eisenhardt, 2009), and lack of a dominant logic to guide actions (Kaplan and Tripsas, 2008; Porac et al, 2002).”
- Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia (2011, background): “…elements often appearing in managerial discussions on business models fall under these headings in a convenient way (e.g. strategic intent falls under “strategy and structure”, customer relationships under “markets and business networks”, and products/offerings under “operations and resources”).”
- Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm (2005, methodology): “Boundary beliefs refer to social constructions that identify a focal firm with a certain interorganizational community (Porac et al, 2002).”
- Categories and Competition (2017, background): “7 Medin (1985) made the same point in their well-known critique of categorization research in psychology.”