Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense
By Paul W. L. Vlaar, F. V. D. van den Bosch, Henk W. Volberda. 2006
313 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2553df3f05399a18a612fbd8dcb0c36c7c3c328
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Dirk De Clercq
- Dimo Dimov
- F. V. D. van den Bosch
- Henk W. Volberda
- Paul W. L. Vlaar
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- S. Lui
- Jeffery S. McMullen
In Sociology and Political Science
In Strategy and Management
- Dirk De Clercq
- Dimo Dimov
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- S. Lui
- Henk W. Volberda
- F. V. D. van den Bosch
- Paul W. L. Vlaar
- F. Bosch
Citations in the corpus
- Towards a Dialectic Perspective on Formalization in Interorganizational Relationships: How Alliance Managers Capitalize on the Duality Inherent in Contracts, Rules and Procedures (2007, background): “This function refers to formalization’s role in facilitating sensemaking (Ring and Van de Ven 1989, 1994; Vlaar et al. 2006), and in generating stable and comprehensible expectations and collective structures from which participants in interorganizational relationships can construct their actions…”
- The Roles of Competence Trust, Formal Contract, and Time Horizon in Interorganizational Learning (2009, background): “Vlaar et al. (2006, 2007) suggest that formal contracting reduces biases, forces articulation, focuses attention, and thus serves as a means to make better sense of an interorganizational relationship.”
- Organizational Social Capital, Formalization, and Internal Knowledge Sharing in Entrepreneurial Orientation Formation (2013, background): “Limited formalization, thus, makes managerial behavior and decisions more opaque and contested, increasing the importance of organizational social capital for fuelling intensive internal knowledge sharing (Michaels et al., 1988; Vlaar et al., 2006).”