A meta-analysis of extensive reading research

By T. Nakanishi. 2015

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd0d8525de750844b2d94ff8c3e15637f7aa46ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. F. Oswald
2. Luke Plonsky
3. R. Day
4. Eun-Young Jeon
5. Dan Brown
6. T. Cobb
7. Alex Boulton
8. Ali H. Al-Hoorie

In Language and Linguistics

1. F. Oswald
2. Luke Plonsky
3. R. Day
4. Eun-Young Jeon
5. Dan Brown
6. T. Cobb
7. Alex Boulton
8. Todd H. McKay

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. F. Oswald
2. R. Day
3. Eun-Young Jeon
4. Luke Plonsky
5. Xian Zhang
6. Songshan Zhang
7. K. Morgan‐Short
8. Dan Brown

Citations in the corpus

• The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis (2016, background): “Nakanishi (2015) included the greatest number of samples up to now: 22 samples for group contrasts and 21 samples for pre-post contrasts.”
• How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014, background): “For example, when multiple versions of the same study were found, or when the same study was available as both a dissertation and a published article, the most recent and/or published version was included (e.g., Grgurović, 2007; Grgurović, Chapelle, & Shelley, 2013; Nakanishi, 2014; Nakanishi, in pr”