Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument

By Barbara M. Byrne. 2001

1,555 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc539511d69ff6570fcbd6158a29c11c779ac0f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication Intention: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (2006, methodology): “…structure has traditionally relied on α2 likelihood ratio test to assess the model fit; however, it had proven to be unrealistic in most SEM empirical research (Byrne, 2001) because the α2 statistics are very sensitive to the sample size, the number of items, and numbers of factors in the model.”
Spiritual Leadership and Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Study (2006, methodology): “theory driven) factor analysis (CFA) within the framework of structural equation modeling (Byrne, 2001).”
Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance (2016, methodology): “Based on Byrne’s (2001) recommendation and using three separate samples (Sample 1 was from a university, Sample 2 from a public sector organisation and Sample 3 from a private sector firm), the five-item measure was tested for the validity of its factorial structure through CFA.”
Brand Personality Structures in the United States and Korea: Common and Culture-Specific Factors (2005, neutral): “Because the chi-square test of overall model fit is sensitive to sample size, a finding of good fit has proven to be unrealistic in most structural equation modeling empirical research ( Byrne, 2001 ).”
Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination (2016, background): “Then, as deviations from univariate and multivariate normality may distort the results of structural equation modeling (Byrne, 2001), we also checked for normality.”
Emotions elicited by local food consumption, memories, place attachment and behavioural intentions (2017, methodology): “Lisrel is considered as a better method than AMOS for testing the fit of the models (Byrne, 2001).”
Intellectual Capital and Corporate Value in an Emerging Economy: Empirical Study of Taiwanese Manufacturers (2005, methodology): “(Byrne, 2001a).”
A Cross-Cultural Approach to Understanding Entrepreneurial Intention (2012, background): “For both relative fit indices, as a rule of thumb, values greater than .90 are considered as indicating a good fit (Byrne, 2001, pp. 79–88).”