A Didactical Framework for the Design of Blended Learning Arrangements

By Michael Kerres, C. D. Witt. 2003

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbf010000665afc3755f1ce3be68a727edb7d06e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

1. Martin Oliver
2. David Stewart
3. Kurt Kraiger
4. Robert A. Wisher
5. Traci Sitzmann
6. Sara de Freitas

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Traci Sitzmann
2. Kurt Kraiger
3. Martin Oliver
4. David Stewart
5. Robert A. Wisher
6. K. Trigwell
7. Sara de Freitas
8. Robert F. Murphy

In Education

1. Traci Sitzmann
2. Martin Oliver
3. David Stewart
4. Kurt Kraiger
5. Robert A. Wisher
6. K. Trigwell
7. Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
8. Liisa Postareff

Citations in the corpus

• THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: (2006, methodology): “The instructional advantage of WBI-S may be due to incorporating both the benefits of personal interaction typically found in CI and self-study between instructional meetings using the Web (Kerres & deWitt, 2003; Masie, 2002).”
• Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed? (2005, background): “Kerres & De Witt (2003), in the same volume as Whitelock & Jelfs’s article, discuss blended learning as the mix of different didactic methods and delivery formats, arguing that these two are independent.”