Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory?

By K. Stanovich. 2008

499 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/435b8ce2b431ff1797008ae4633ba4fd3549c8fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, result): “This finding is consistent with prior research showing that Intellect is a larger construct consisting of both the ability and drive to engage in complex problem solving and reasoning (DeYoung, 2011; DeYoung et al., 2007; Stanovich, 2009; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “…when they can be completed using cognitively less demanding strategies (see, e.g. Evans, 2008, 2009; Glöckner & Witteman, 2010; Hogarth, 2005; Stanovich, 2009), for example when responses are driven by clear “perceptual” patterns or environmental cues, rely on learned associations or on…”
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014, methodology): “…e.g., Kanazawa, 2010; Moore, Clark, & Kane, 2008) or intuitive versus deliberative thinking disposition (e.g., Bartels, 2008; Paxton, Unger, & Greene, 2012), Stanovich theorises that both are key factors in determining the relative influence of analytic processing on behaviour (Stanovich, 2009b).”
Culturally antagonistic memes and the Zika virus: an experimental test (2017, unknown): “That is, it must, through preconscious mechanisms, make its presence felt when the occasion arises, and appropriately orient individuals with respect to the object being classified (Stanovich 2009, 2011).”
On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, background): “…and their relation to intelligence, help to explain one data trend that has been uncovered— that some rational thinking problems show surprising degrees of dissociation from cognitive ability (Stanovich, 2009b, 2011; Stanovich & West, 2007, 2008a, 2008b; West, Toplak, & Stanovich, 2008).”
Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectives (2009, background): “We also take from EP the evolutionary origins of human nature; hence, the frequent 12 See Stanovich (2008) for a recent attempt to formulate a tri-process theory. mismatch between the ancient ecology to which it is adapted and the demands of modern civilization.”
Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making (2010, background): “Stanovich (2004; see also Stanovich, 2009, and Evans, 2008, 2009) labels this multiplicity of type I systems The Autonomous Set of Systems (TASS): a set of multiple processes that function automatically in response to triggering stimuli.”
A Dual Process Account of Creative Thinking (2011, background): “Stanovich (2009) has suggested that that type 2 thinking can, itself, be understood as comprising the reflective and the algorithmic mind.”
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011, background): “As Kahneman and Frederick made clear in their 2002 paper, this framework of an incorrectly primed initial response that must be overridden fits in nicely with currently popular dual-process frameworks (De Neys & Glumicic, 2008 ;E vans,1984, 2008, 2010 ;E vans & Frankish, 2009; Lieberman, 2007, 2009;”
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “Hence, Stanovich (2004, 2009a, 2011) has argued that the execution of Type 1 processes is mandatory when their triggering stimuli are encountered and they are not dependent on input from high-level control systems.”
Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective (2010, background): “, Gigerenzer & Regier, 1996; Keren & Schul, 2009; Osman, 2004; Shanks & St John, 1994) and also recently questioned and radically revised by those working within the paradigm (Evans, 2006a, 2010; Stanovich, 2009a; 2010).”
Practitioner review: do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? (2013, unknown): “For this reason, Stanovich (2009a) has suggested that the term executive processes has been mis-named.”
Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing (2012, methodology): “In our model (Stanovich 2004, 2009, 2011), the defining feature of Type 1 processing is its autonomy—the execution of Type 1 processes is mandatory when their triggering stimuli are encountered, and they are not dependent on input from high-level control systems.”
The Moral Foreign-Language Effect (2016, background): “Stanovich (2009) has argued that there are more than two types of processes, and what we say in this paper does not preclude this possibility.”