Woodcock-Johnson III Tests Of Cognitive Abilities

486 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An Investigation of the Mathematics-Vocabulary Knowledge of First-Grade Students (2017, methodology): “The WJ-III math fluency subtest has adequate split-half reliability (rp .90), test-retest reliability (r p .95; Woodcock et al., 2001), and criterion validity (r p .67), as measured against the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1985).”
Physical Activity, Self-Regulation, and Early Academic Achievement in Preschool Children (2014, background): “Previous research has shown high reliability for preschool-age children on both the English and Spanish versions of the task (Schrank, 2005; Woodcock & Mather, 2000).”
Examining the Relations Between Executive Function, Math, and Literacy During the Transition to Kindergarten: A Multi-Analytic Approach (2017, methodology): “Children’s literacy and math skills were assessed using the Woodcock Johnson PsychoEducational Battery-III Tests of Achievement (WJ-III; Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001a) in English or the Batería III Woodcock–Muñoz (Muñoz-Sandoval, Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2005a) in Spanish.”
The Multidimensional Knowledge in Text Comprehension framework (2021, methodology): “This type of knowledge is often assessed with the use of measures such as the Woodcock–Johnson Academic Knowledge Test (Wendling et al., 2009) and the knowledge subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Tests (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; Weschler Intelligence Test for Children).2 General world…”