Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.
By Keith Thiede, Mary C. M. Anderson, David J. Therriault. 2003
840 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f83c7bb6e590f6276f46a0dc12927483ba2fd78e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Fred Paas
- Tamara van Gog
- Richard E. Mayer
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Logan Fiorella
- John Sweller
- Jennifer Wiley
- Alexander Renkl
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Tamara van Gog
- Fred Paas
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Richard E. Mayer
- Anique B. H. de Bruin
- Alexander Renkl
- Logan Fiorella
- John Sweller
Citations in the corpus
- What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses (2005, background): “quite low, with correlations rarely exceeding +.40 (for a review, see Maki, 1998a, and for exceptions, see Thiede et al., 2003; Weaver & Bryant, 1995).”
- Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use (2010, methodology): “Thiede and colleagues (i.e., Thiede & Anderson, 2003; Thiede et al., 2003) were able to increase monitoring accuracy from 0.”
- Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom (2012, background): “Cue activation techniques that have proven to be successful in adults are providing a summary (Thiede & Anderson, 2003), or generating keywords (Thiede et al., 2003).”
- Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials (2007, background): “…shown that the accuracy of global predictions is quite poor, with the mean across individual correlations usually around .25 (e.g., Maki, 1998; Miesner & Maki, 2007 this issue; Weaver, Bryant, & Burns, 1995; for recent reports of enhanced accuracy, see Dunlosky & Rawson, 2005; Thiede et al., 2003).”
- Effective Implementation of Metacognition (2009, methodology): “cognitive process being evaluated (Finn, 2008; Metcalfe & Finn, 2008; Thiede et al., 2003 ).”
- A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy (2008, background): “Hodge et al. 1992; Kohler 2002; Leasure 1997; Nietfeld and Schraw 2002; Talbot 1997; Thiede et al. 2003 ).”
- Training metacognition in the classroom: the influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions (2011, background): “If making predictions encourages students to be more proficient at self-monitoring and they then regulate their study as in Thiede et al. (2003), then exam scores might improve across the four exams.”
- The Self-Regulation-View in Writing-to-Learn: Using Journal Writing to Optimize Cognitive Load in Self-Regulated Learning (2020, methodology): “…this possibility could be promising because several effective methods to enhance monitoring accuracy, such as asking learners to generate keywords (Thiede et al. 2003) or to complete a diagram (van de Pol et al. 2019), this issue; Prinz et al. 2020), similarly engage learners in writing down…”
- Metacomprehension A Brief History and How to Improve Its Accuracy (2007, background): “For instance, Thiede, Anderson, and Therriault (2003) had college students study six texts on topics such as Norse settlements and naval warfare.”