Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations

By Deborah J. Webb, Corliss L. Green, T. Brashear. 2000

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f70c8b465f0260ded275bbe5c3e13f5f70be6843

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation (2005, background): “Additional criteria that we used to select the nonprofit organizations were that they were well-known; national in scope; and had the potential to identify, attract, and retain donors (see Webb et al. 2000 ).”
Donate Time or Money? The Determinants of Donation Intention in Online Crowdfunding (2019, background): “These include studies on organic food purchase intention [57,58], green hotel revisit intention [49,59], and blood donors’ intention [51].”
Issue contingencies and marketers' recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions (2004, result): “Similar studies have reported response rates of 12.5% (Rallapalli et al., 1998) and 14% (Webb et al., 2000).”
Ethics Code Awareness, Perceived Ethical Values, and Organizational Commitment (2003, neutral): “Although the percentage of surveys returned seems somewhat low, comparable research has yielded similar response rates (cf. Rallapalli, Vitell, and Barnes 1998; Webb, Green, and Brashear 2000).”
Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability (2013, background): “2000) for ENV, Attitude for Helping Others (AHO) (Webb et al. 2000) for SOC and Financial Self-Efficacy (FSE) (Stone et al.”
The Development and Validation of the Motives to Donate Scale (2018, background): “As in prior research, we include questions assessing attitudes toward charitable organizations and altruistic values (Webb et al., 2000).”
Measuring Commuters' Perception on Service Quality Using SERVQUAL in Public Transportation (2011, result): “This supports the validity of the questionnaire (Webb et al. 2000).”
Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork (2007, background): “Previous social psychology research has found that psychometric scales, similar to that used here, measuring altruism and attitudes toward helping others are good predictors of pro-social orientation, completion of organdonor cards, actual contributions to charities, and peer ratings of altruism (e.”
The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing (2002, background): “Webb, Green, and Brashear (2000) provide a good application of the content saturation procedure for developing two new attitude scales.”
Effects of price premium and product type on the choice of cause‐related brands: a Singapore perspective (2004, background): “In the marketing literature, Webb et al . (2000)”
Sharing Sustainability: How Values and Ethics Matter in Consumers’ Adoption of Public Bicycle-Sharing Scheme (2016, background): “Third, the average variance extracted values of most factors exceeded 0.50 (Fornell and Larcker 1981), except those of collectivism (0.47) and materialism (0.46), which were acceptably approaching 0.50 (e.g., Webb et al. 2000).”