Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour (2020, background): “…of natural resources), social (e.g., reduction of social tension) and economic (e.g., making economic issues consistent with ecological concerns) aspects into defining the various practices of consumption behaviour (Balderjahn et al., 2013; Geiger, Fischer, & Schrader, 2018; Glavi & Lukman, 2007).”
A Review of Sustainable Consumption (2000 to 2020): What We Know and What We Need to Know (2020, unknown): “…have adopted models/frameworks in order to explain the phenomenon, such as the cube model of SCB (Fischer et al., 2017), expectancy value model (Balderjahn et al., 2013), reciprocal determinism framework (Lee, 2014), intention-purchase gap (Park & Lin, 2020), attitude-behavior gap (Quoquab et…”
The Sustainability Roots of Anticonsumption Lifestyles and Initial Insights Regarding Their Effects on Consumers' Well-Being (2016, methodology): “Regarding the economic aspect of consumers’ sustainability, Balderjahn et al. (2013) described three different types or aspects of sustainable consumption: voluntary simplicity, collaborative consumption, and debt-free consumption.”