Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork

By Jayson L. Lusk, Tomas Nilsson, K. Foster. 2007

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94122eda159ba98120fb06c4e3a5b6c80fb5ec7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Olynk
2. D. Thilmany
3. J. Bergh
4. C. Wolf
5. Riccarda Moser
6. R. Raffaelli
7. G. Tonsor
8. F. Norwood

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. N. Olynk
2. J. Bergh
3. C. Wolf
4. G. Tonsor
5. G. Kallis
6. Daniel W. O’Neill
7. C. Spash

In Marketing

1. N. Olynk
2. D. Thilmany
3. J. Bergh
4. C. Wolf
5. Riccarda Moser
6. R. Raffaelli
7. G. Tonsor

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors (2008, background): “In addition, they report that on average consumers pay 2.6% more for (Blue Angel) labelled products (Bjørner et al., 2004; Lusk et al., 2007; Kotchen and Moore, 2007).”
• Consumer Preferences for Fruit and Vegetables with Credence-Based Attributes: A Review (2011, background): “While experience and search good involves usually private good characteristics, credence good provides private benefits to those who consume the good, while its production often has " affiliated public dimensions " (Lusk et al. 2007).”
• Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, background): “A few studies have focused on consumer valuations of “animal friendly” products (Lusk, Nilsson, and Foster, 2007; Carlsson, Frykblom, and Lagerkvist, 2007b and 2007c; Lijenstolpe, 2008; Nilsson, Foster, and Lusk, 2006).”