Engagement in School and Out-of-School Contexts: A Multidimensional View of Engagement

By Jennifer Fredricks. 2011

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f64931da15e0abf42d914b9956410aeececde76d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory (2021, background): “Student engagement is energized by motivation (Reeve, 2013) and fostered by various contextual factors (e.g., teacher, peer, and environmental support) (Fredricks, 2011; Lam et al., 2012), as explained by self-determination theory (SDT; Ryan & Deci, 2017, 2020).”
The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science (2015, background): “Educators, theorists, and policymakers tout engagement as a key to addressing educational problems such as low achievement and escalating dropout rates (Fredricks, 2011; Fredricks et al., 2004).”
Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education (2017, background): “Teachers can model emotional engagement through their own enthusiasm (Fredricks, 2011) to positively influence students’ emotional engagement (e.g., Kunter et al., 2008).”
Examining the effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom: An action research study (2013, background): “Thus, engagement affects achievement and performance (Fredricks, 2011; Marzano, 2013).”
The Teachers’ Role in Student Engagement: A Review (2020, background): “Indeed, student engagement continues to be identified as a significant issue in Australia, particularly in relation to the middle years of schooling (CESE, 2015; Fredricks, 2011; Zyngier, 2008).”
Coding Classroom Interactions for Collective and Individual Engagement (2015, background): “Many researchers agree that engagement is a metaconstruct that consists of multiple dimensions of involvement (e.g., behavioral, emotional, cognitive, agentic; see Sinatra et al., this issue) and exists on a continuum (Appleton, Christenson, & Furlong, 2008; Fredricks, 2011).”