Diversity in the US Federal Government: Diversity Management and Employee Turnover in Federal Agencies

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Meta-Analysis of Job Satisfaction Correlates in the Public Administration Literature (2016, methodology): “The Federal Employee View Point Survey (United States Office of Personnel Management), which has been used by some studies in our final sample (e.g., Caillier, 2012, 2013; Cho & Perry, 2012; Cho & Sai, 2013; Choi, 2009), measures job satisfaction in terms of both overall feeling and specific facets.”
Organizational Justice and Employee Work Attitudes: The Federal Case (2011, background): “Finally, the potential effects of work characteristics and individual factors on turnover should be controlled to obtain a more accurate pattern of the relationships between organizational justice and turnover (Choi, 2009).”
Diversity management for all? An empirical analysis of diversity management outcomes across groups (2015, methodology): “Diversity management was measured using a three-item scale derived from previous research studying the effectiveness of diversity management (Choi, 2009; Pitts, 2009).”
Does Turnover Intention Matter? Evaluating the Usefulness of Turnover Intention Rate as a Predictor of Actual Turnover Rate (2016, background): “Turnover research evaluating gender differences has generally found that women, compared with men, are absent more frequently, have lower intentions to stay, and voluntarily terminate employment relationships more frequently (Bae & Goodman, 2014; Choi, 2009).”